resample: improve performance (thanks José Miguel Sánchez García)
Resample is well known for taking a long time to resize an image. This patch brings an important performance boost (in my test image, time was reduced from ~2850ms to ~500ms). It does that by extracting FP multiplication and division out of the innermost loop of resamplex/resampley. The results differ slightly from the current implementation: in my test: ~0.3% of the bytes had a ±2 difference in their value, which I attribute to rounding errors. I'm personally not concerned with that deviation, given the performance gains. However, I recommend testing it just to be sure I didn't overlook anything. José Miguel Sánchez García
This commit is contained in:
parent
b0e2ea4e5f
commit
e0cf0261d0
1 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -67,10 +67,10 @@ void
|
||||||
resamplex(uchar *in, int off, int d, int inx, uchar *out, int outx)
|
resamplex(uchar *in, int off, int d, int inx, uchar *out, int outx)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int i, x, k;
|
int i, x, k;
|
||||||
double X, xx, v, rat;
|
double X, xx, v, rat, rato10;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
rat = (double)inx/(double)outx;
|
rat = (double)inx/(double)outx;
|
||||||
|
rato10 = rat/10.;
|
||||||
for(x=0; x<outx; x++){
|
for(x=0; x<outx; x++){
|
||||||
if(inx == outx){
|
if(inx == outx){
|
||||||
/* don't resample if size unchanged */
|
/* don't resample if size unchanged */
|
||||||
|
@ -79,14 +79,15 @@ resamplex(uchar *in, int off, int d, int inx, uchar *out, int outx)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
v = 0.0;
|
v = 0.0;
|
||||||
X = x*rat;
|
X = x*rat;
|
||||||
|
xx = X + rato10*(-K2);
|
||||||
for(k=-K2; k<=K2; k++){
|
for(k=-K2; k<=K2; k++){
|
||||||
xx = X + rat*k/10.;
|
|
||||||
i = xx;
|
i = xx;
|
||||||
if(i < 0)
|
if(i < 0)
|
||||||
i = 0;
|
i = 0;
|
||||||
if(i >= inx)
|
if(i >= inx)
|
||||||
i = inx-1;
|
i = inx-1;
|
||||||
v += in[off+i*d] * K[K2+k];
|
v += in[off+i*d] * K[K2+k];
|
||||||
|
xx += rato10;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
out[off+x*d] = v;
|
out[off+x*d] = v;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -96,9 +97,10 @@ void
|
||||||
resampley(uchar **in, int off, int iny, uchar **out, int outy)
|
resampley(uchar **in, int off, int iny, uchar **out, int outy)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int y, i, k;
|
int y, i, k;
|
||||||
double Y, yy, v, rat;
|
double Y, yy, v, rat, rato10;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
rat = (double)iny/(double)outy;
|
rat = (double)iny/(double)outy;
|
||||||
|
rato10 = rat/10.;
|
||||||
for(y=0; y<outy; y++){
|
for(y=0; y<outy; y++){
|
||||||
if(iny == outy){
|
if(iny == outy){
|
||||||
/* don't resample if size unchanged */
|
/* don't resample if size unchanged */
|
||||||
|
@ -107,14 +109,15 @@ resampley(uchar **in, int off, int iny, uchar **out, int outy)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
v = 0.0;
|
v = 0.0;
|
||||||
Y = y*rat;
|
Y = y*rat;
|
||||||
|
yy = Y + rato10*(-K2);
|
||||||
for(k=-K2; k<=K2; k++){
|
for(k=-K2; k<=K2; k++){
|
||||||
yy = Y + rat*k/10.;
|
|
||||||
i = yy;
|
i = yy;
|
||||||
if(i < 0)
|
if(i < 0)
|
||||||
i = 0;
|
i = 0;
|
||||||
if(i >= iny)
|
if(i >= iny)
|
||||||
i = iny-1;
|
i = iny-1;
|
||||||
v += in[i][off] * K[K2+k];
|
v += in[i][off] * K[K2+k];
|
||||||
|
yy += rato10;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
out[y][off] = v;
|
out[y][off] = v;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue