upas/marshal: change Inline: to Include: header, interpret even withou -8 flag

after some thought, the file attachment headers Attach: and Include:
(before Inline:) are more like the Subject: line and should be interpreted
every time.
This commit is contained in:
cinap_lenrek 2013-01-01 16:27:01 +01:00
parent be01be80cc
commit 0e4fc14f7e
2 changed files with 19 additions and 11 deletions

View file

@ -155,12 +155,9 @@ pgp encrypt the message
.B -8
reads recipients (
.B To:
and
.B Cc:
) and attachments (
.B Attach:
and
.B Inline:
.B Bcc:
) from RFC 822 header of the message
.PD
.PP
@ -184,6 +181,17 @@ For example:
.EX
upasname=natasha@kremvax.com upas/mail boris@squirrel.com
.EE
.PP
.I Marshal
interprets file attachment headers
.B Attach:
and
.B Include:
as if the
.B -A
or
.B -a
options would have been given.
.SH FILES
.TP
.B /mail/box/*/dead.letter

View file

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ enum {
Hx,
Hprecedence,
Hattach,
Hinline,
Hinclude,
Nhdr,
};
@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ char *hdrs[Nhdr] = {
[Hcontent] "content-",
[Hx] "x-",
[Hprecedence] "precedence",
[Hattach] "attach",
[Hinline] "inline",
[Hattach] "attach:",
[Hinclude] "include:",
};
struct Ctype {
@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)
*/
holding = holdon();
headersrv = readheaders(&in, &flags, &hdrstring,
eightflag? &to: nil, eightflag? &cc: nil, eightflag? &bcc: nil, eightflag? l: nil, 1);
eightflag? &to: nil, eightflag? &cc: nil, eightflag? &bcc: nil, l, 1);
if(rfc822syntaxerror){
Bdrain(&in);
fatal("rfc822 syntax error, message not sent");
@ -501,10 +501,10 @@ readheaders(Biobuf *in, int *fp, String **sp, Addr **top, Addr **ccp, Addr **bcc
s_append(s, "\n");
break;
case Hattach:
case Hinline:
case Hinclude:
if(att == nil)
goto Addhdr;
*att = mkattach(hdrval(s_to_c(sline)), nil, hdrtype == Hinline);
break;
*att = mkattach(hdrval(s_to_c(sline)), nil, hdrtype == Hinclude);
if(*att != nil)
att = &(*att)->next;
break;