Fixed setting the adult and disguising non-living to living

This commit is contained in:
Andrew 2013-07-16 17:05:44 +12:00
parent 0ddec96d24
commit 2d34be3276

View file

@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import java.util.Random;
import me.libraryaddict.disguise.DisguiseTypes.Watchers.AgeableWatcher;
import me.libraryaddict.disguise.DisguiseTypes.Watchers.LivingWatcher;
import me.libraryaddict.disguise.DisguiseTypes.Watchers.ZombieWatcher;
import net.minecraft.server.v1_6_R2.DataWatcher;
import net.minecraft.server.v1_6_R2.Entity;
import net.minecraft.server.v1_6_R2.EntityAgeable;
@ -48,7 +49,6 @@ public class Disguise {
ProtocolManager manager = ProtocolLibrary.getProtocolManager();
Entity entity = ((CraftEntity) e).getHandle();
Location loc = e.getLocation();
if (getType() == DisguiseType.EXPERIENCE_ORB) {
spawnPackets[0] = manager.createPacket(Packets.Server.ADD_EXP_ORB);
@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ public class Disguise {
yawValue -= 128;
mods.write(8, yawValue);
mods.write(9, (byte) (int) (entity.pitch * 256.0F / 360.0F));
if (entity instanceof EntityLiving)
mods.write(10, (byte) (int) (((EntityLiving) entity).aA * 256.0F / 360.0F));
DataWatcher newWatcher = new DataWatcher();
try {
@ -239,7 +240,7 @@ public class Disguise {
}
public void constructWatcher(EntityType type, int entityId) {
boolean throwError = false;
FlagWatcher tempWatcher;
try {
String name;
if (getType() == DisguiseType.MINECART_FURNACE || getType() == DisguiseType.MINECART_HOPPER
@ -251,44 +252,45 @@ public class Disguise {
}
Class watcherClass = Class.forName("me.libraryaddict.disguise.DisguiseTypes.Watchers." + name + "Watcher");
Constructor<?> contructor = watcherClass.getDeclaredConstructor(int.class);
watcher = (FlagWatcher) contructor.newInstance(entityId);
throwError = true;
if (watcher instanceof AgeableWatcher && this instanceof MobDisguise) {
((AgeableWatcher) watcher).setValue(12, ((MobDisguise) this).isAdult() ? 0 : -23999);
}
tempWatcher = (FlagWatcher) contructor.newInstance(entityId);
} catch (Exception ex) {
if (throwError)
ex.printStackTrace();
// There is no watcher for this entity, or a error was thrown.
if (type.isAlive())
watcher = new LivingWatcher(entityId);
tempWatcher = new LivingWatcher(entityId);
else
watcher = new FlagWatcher(entityId);
tempWatcher = new FlagWatcher(entityId);
}
if (this instanceof MobDisguise) {
if (tempWatcher instanceof AgeableWatcher)
tempWatcher.setValue(12, ((MobDisguise) this).isAdult() ? 0 : -24000);
else if (tempWatcher instanceof ZombieWatcher)
tempWatcher.setValue(12, (byte) (((MobDisguise) this).isAdult() ? 0 : 1));
}
HashMap<Integer, Object> disguiseValues = Values.getMetaValues(getType());
HashMap<Integer, Object> entityValues = Values.getMetaValues(DisguiseType.getType(type));
// Start from 2 as they ALL share 0 and 1
for (int dataNo = 2; dataNo <= 31; dataNo++) {
// If the watcher already set a metadata on this
if (watcher.getValue(dataNo, null) != null)
if (tempWatcher.getValue(dataNo, null) != null)
continue;
// If neither of them touch it
if (!entityValues.containsKey(dataNo) && !disguiseValues.containsKey(dataNo))
continue;
// If the disguise has this, but not the entity. Then better set it!
if (!entityValues.containsKey(dataNo) && disguiseValues.containsKey(dataNo)) {
watcher.setValue(dataNo, disguiseValues.get(dataNo));
tempWatcher.setValue(dataNo, disguiseValues.get(dataNo));
continue;
}
// Else if the disguise doesn't have it. But the entity does. Better remove it!
if (entityValues.containsKey(dataNo) && !disguiseValues.containsKey(dataNo)) {
watcher.setValue(dataNo, null);
tempWatcher.setValue(dataNo, null);
continue;
}
// Hmm. They both have the datavalue. Time to check if they have different default values!
if (!entityValues.get(dataNo).equals(disguiseValues.get(dataNo))) {
if (entityValues.get(dataNo) != disguiseValues.get(dataNo)
|| !entityValues.get(dataNo).equals(disguiseValues.get(dataNo))) {
// They do! Set the default value!
watcher.setValue(dataNo, disguiseValues.get(dataNo));
tempWatcher.setValue(dataNo, disguiseValues.get(dataNo));
continue;
}
// Hmm. They both now have data values which are exactly the same. I need to do more intensive background checks.
@ -321,8 +323,9 @@ public class Disguise {
continue;
// Well I can't find a reason I should leave it alone. They will probably conflict.
// Time to set the value to the disguises value so no conflicts!
watcher.setValue(dataNo, disguiseValues.get(dataNo));
tempWatcher.setValue(dataNo, disguiseValues.get(dataNo));
}
watcher = tempWatcher;
}
public DisguiseType getType() {