Remove macro definition and the remaining uses.
RETURN() macro is just a wrapper for goto, most of the time it makes the code more complicated than using goto directly.
- Respect the toggle key settings.
- Change the hot key settings in
base/setup/lib/mui.c.
- Revert IntDefWindowProc function about
Alt+Shift handling.
- Delete some code in
co_IntProcessKeyboardMessage for Alt+Shift
handling.
- Add IntGetNextKL, IntLanguageToggle, and
IntCheckLanguageToggle helper functions.
- Modify ProcessKeyEvent and
UserGetLanguageToggle functions to
support [Left Alt]+Shift and Ctrl+Shift.
- Improve WM_INPUTLANGCHANGEREQUEST
handling.
- Message handling shouldn't access kbswitch
directly.
CORE-10667
- Use newly-defined Imm32CurrentPti() instead of NtCurrentTeb()->Win32ThreadInfo.
- THREADSTATE_GETTHREADINFO is same as THREADSTATE_UNKNOWN18.
- Use the paged pool to allocate HIMC rather than heap.
- Fix and improve ImmDestroyContext function.
CORE-11700
It popped up very reliably when performing git-clone of the ros sources
while having the taskmgr open in the processes-tab.
Or when building 'ninja bootcd -j1' while having the taskmgr open in the processes-tab.
It is always possible to ignore it and then continue using ros for days without
noticing any side effects.
James Tabor judged the assert to have a "questionable logic".
Giannis who once added it, was also ok with commenting it.
His words:
This assertion isn't something fatal,
the worst thing that can happen from continuing on it would be
to make the thread get awake more times than it should.
It was commented out already on 2020-04-21 via
0.4.14-dev-1519-g 87f6c82d85
It popped up 2-3 times for me during several
months of ros usage and I could continue without
noticing any side effects.
Giannis who once added it, was ok with commenting it.
His words:
This assertion isn't something fatal,
the worst thing that can happen from continuing on it would be
to make the thread get awake more times than it should.
CORE-15147
- Rename CLIENTTHREADINFO::tickLastMsgChecked into timeLastRead as
documented in https://reactos.org/wiki/Techwiki:Win32k/CLIENTTHREADINFO .
This is the last time the message queue was read.
- This is the structure member one must compare against the current tick
count timestamp in order to heuristically determine whether a message
queue thread is hung!! Fix MsqIsHung() in accordance, add extra debug
logging in order to help us determining which of our code present
regular GUI hangs, and add as well an extra "TimeOut" parameter so as
not to hardcode a fixed value within that function but instead
allowing its caller to specify possible different values.
- THREADINFO::timeLast is on the contrary the last message time stamp,
and will definitively differ from CLIENTTHREADINFO::timeLastRead .
It should only be used for information purposes!
- Accordingly, in NtUserGetThreadState()::THREADSTATE_UPTIMELASTREAD
and in InitThreadCallback(), only (re-)initialize the timeLastRead
member of the CLIENTTHREADINFO structure of the THREADINFO of interest.
- In co_IntPeekMessage(), update more often the timeLastRead timestamp
whenever the current message queue has been read (but NOT timeLast!!
That one will be updated ONLY WHEN a message is found!).
- In co_IntSendMessageTimeoutSingle() first check whether the window to
which we send the message is being destroyed, before checking for
queue hangs etc. Collapse the logic checks for queue hang and increase
the hang timeout check to 4 times MSQ_HUNG (== 4 * 5 seconds) and
display a debug trace.
