If so, return such BCB instead of creating a new one. This will
allow (at some point) to be more consistent in case of concurrent
mapping.
This fixes a few CcMapData tests.
Given current ReactOS implementation, a VACB can be pinned
several times, with different BCB. In next commits, a single
BCB will be able to be pinned several times. That would
lead to severe inconsistencies in counting and thus corruption.
This could be triggered when attempting to read/write to really big
files. It was causing an attempt to read 0 bytes in Cc, leading to
asserts failure in the kernel (and corrupted file).
CORE-15067
Currently, our CcMapData() behavior (same goes for CcPinRead()) is broken
and is the total opposite of what Windows kernel does. By default, the later
will let you map a view in memory without even attempting to bring its
data in memory. On first access, there will be a fault and memory will
be read from the hardware and brought to memory. If you want to force read
on mapping/pinning, you have to set the MAP_NO_READ (or PIN_NO_READ) flag
where kernel will fault on your behalf (hence the need for MAP_WAIT/PIN_WAIT).
On ReactOS, by default, on mapping (and thus pinning), we will force a view
read so that data is in memory. The way our cache memory is managed at the
moment seems not to allow to fault on invalid access and if we don't force
read, the memory content will just be zeroed.
So trying to match Windows behavior, by default, now CcMapData() will enforce
the MAP_NO_READ flag and warn once about this behavior change.
It's based on the code that was in CcPinRead() implementation. This
made no sense to have CcPinMappedData() doing nothing while implementing
everything in CcPinRead(). Indeed, drivers (starting with MS drivers)
can map data first and pin it afterwards with CcPinMappedData(). It was
leading to incorrect behavior with our previous noop implementation.
kmtest:NtCreateSection calls CcInitializeCacheMap with a
NULL value for SectionObjectPointers. This will cause an exception when
trying to access it, which in Windows can be handled gracefully.
However accessing it while holding ViewLock means the lock will not be
released, leading to an APC_INDEX_MISMATCH bugcheck.
This solves the problem by allocating SharedCacheMap outside the lock,
then freeing it again under lock if another thread has updated SharedCacheMap
in the mean time. This is also What Windows Does(TM).
This avoids a really nasty race condition in our cache controler where
two concurrents could try to initialize cache on the same file.
This had two nasty effects: first shared map was purely leaked and erased
by the second one. And the private cache map, allocated on the first shared
cache map couldn't be freed and was leading to Mm BSOD (free in a middle of
a block).
This was often triggered while building ReactOS on ReactOS (with multi threads).
With that patch, I cannot crash anylonger while building ReactOS.
CORE-14634
In the lazy writer run, first post items that are queued for this.
Only then, start executing deferred writes if any.
If there were any, reschedule immediately a lazy writer run, to keep
Cc warm and to make it unqueue write faster in case of high IOs situation.
To make second lazy writer run happen faster, we keep our state active to
use short delay (1s) instead of standard idle (3s).
Recent changes seem to show that it's not
required to be exclusive on VACB to be able
to flush it.
This commit goes with f2c44aa and fixes the
last issues going with copying huge files.
There are no longer BSODs (be it in Mm or Cc).
I could, with 750MB RAM extract a 2GB file from
a 53MB archive and copy a 2,5GB file from a VBox
share to the disk. Note that writes are often
deferred, so if copy works, it's not that fast for now.
Note that it also brings some beloved behavior from
Windows: copy times are totally unreliable now when
writes are deferred. Little remaining times when
actively copying, high remaining times when deferred
writes in action. And goes between both... Sorry! ;-)
https://xkcd.com/612/
CORE-9696
CORE-11175
Same mechanism exists in Windows (even their Cc
is way different from ours...) where when Cc is
out of memory (in their case, out of VACB), we
will start scavenge old & unused VACB to free
some of the memory.
It's useful in case we're operating we big files
operations, we may run out of memory where to map
VACB for them, so start to scavenge VACB to free
some of that memory.
With this, I am able to install Qt 4.8.6 with 2,5GB of RAM,
scavenging acting when needed!
CORE-12081
CORE-14582
Adjusting refcount and enabling lazy-write for pinned
VACB makes it actually more efficient, often purging
data to disk, reducing memory stress for the system.
This is required for defering writes.
This commit unfortunately (?) reverts a previous revert.
CORE-12081
CORE-14582
CORE-14313
When no name is set in the file object, try to read the name
from the FCB. We only support FastFAT (ours) FCB for now.
This is clearly a hack, but for a kdbg command, so ;-)
It seems that on process killing, some VACB may be deleted while
still mapped. With current reference counting, they will actually
not be deleted, but leaked, and an ASSERT will be triggered.
CORE-14578
This has have several benefits for ReactOS Cc:
- It helps reducing potential deadlocks situations in Cc
- It speeds up ReactOS by reducing locks
- It gets us a bit closer to Windows VACB
CORE-14349
The avoids race conditions where attempts to read from disk to
not fully initialized VACB were performed.
Also, added more debug prints in such situations.
CORE-14349
This allows being consistent between newly created and looked up
so that VACB can always safely be released.
Should really help with reference issues.
CORE-14481
CORE-14480
CORE-14482
This fixes various bugs linked to VACB counting:
- VACB not released when it should be
- Reference count expectations not being accurate
For the record, VACB should always have at least a reference
count of 1, unless you are to free it and removed it from
any linked list.
This commit also adds a bunch of asserts that should
help triggering invalid reference counting.
It should also fix numerous ASSERT currently triggered and
may help fixing random behaviours in Cc.
CORE-14285
CORE-14401
CORE-14293
This avoids locking Cc for too long by trying to read-ahead data which
is already in cache.
We now will only schedule a read ahead if next read should bring us
to a new VACB (perhaps not in cache).
This notably fixes Inkscape setup which was slown down by read-ahead
due to continous 1 byte reads.
Thanks to Thomas for his help on this issue.
CORE-14395
