mirror of
https://github.com/reactos/reactos.git
synced 2025-02-24 17:34:57 +00:00
- Minor cleanup.
See issue #3054 for more details. svn path=/trunk/; revision=32302
This commit is contained in:
parent
be80dacf70
commit
f754465df3
2 changed files with 1 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -542,10 +542,6 @@ NtAllocateVirtualMemory(IN HANDLE ProcessHandle,
|
|||
* PAGE_EXECUTE_READ, PAGE_EXECUTE_READWRITE, PAGE_GUARD,
|
||||
* PAGE_NOACCESS
|
||||
* RETURNS: Status
|
||||
* NOTES: Must run at IRQL PASSIVE_LEVEL? (or is APC_LEVEL cool too?)
|
||||
* MSDN states that ZwAllocateVirtualMemory IRQL must be PASSIVE_LEVEL,
|
||||
* but why wouldn't APC_LEVEL be valid (or is that only for the Zw* version
|
||||
* and Nt* can indeed run at APC_LEVEL?)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
{
|
||||
PEPROCESS Process;
|
||||
|
@ -561,10 +557,7 @@ NtAllocateVirtualMemory(IN HANDLE ProcessHandle,
|
|||
PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BoundaryAddressMultiple;
|
||||
KPROCESSOR_MODE PreviousMode;
|
||||
|
||||
// TMN: Someone Pick one of these. Until it's clear which
|
||||
// level is allowed, I play it safe and check for <= APC_LEVEL
|
||||
PAGED_CODE();
|
||||
// ASSERT(KeGetCurrentIrql() == PASSIVE_LEVEL);
|
||||
|
||||
DPRINT("NtAllocateVirtualMemory(*UBaseAddress %x, "
|
||||
"ZeroBits %d, *URegionSize %x, AllocationType %x, Protect %x)\n",
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ MmInitializeProcessAddressSpace(IN PEPROCESS Process,
|
|||
szDest = Process->ImageFileName;
|
||||
lnFName = min(lnFName, sizeof(Process->ImageFileName) - 1);
|
||||
while (lnFName--) *szDest++ = (UCHAR)*szSrc++;
|
||||
*szDest = UNICODE_NULL;
|
||||
*szDest = ANSI_NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Check if caller wants an audit name */
|
||||
if (AuditName)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue