Intravision/reactos
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/reactos/reactos.git synced 2024-07-22 04:08:08 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fixed RtlEnterCriticalSection not to fail on wrong assumptions and added comment on why the debug message "Critical section not initialized (guess)" is wrong

Browse source 
svn path=/trunk/; revision=13641
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Bluemel 2005-02-19 13:13:17 +00:00
parent 99f3640c17
commit c6a8c7496f
1 changed files with 13 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

22
reactos/lib/ntdll/rtl/critical.c
View file

@ -144,23 +144,27 @@ RtlEnterCriticalSection(
*/
if (Thread == CriticalSection->OwningThread) {
/* You own it, so you'll get it when you're done with it! */
/* You own it, so you'll get it when you're done with it! No need to
use the interlocked functions as only the thread who already owns
the lock can modify this data. */
CriticalSection->RecursionCount++;
return STATUS_SUCCESS;
}
else if (CriticalSection->OwningThread == (HANDLE)0)
{
/* No one else owns it either! */
DPRINT1("Critical section not initialized (guess)!\n");
/* FIXME: raise exception */
return STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER;
}
/* NOTE - CriticalSection->OwningThread can be NULL here because changing
this information is not serialized. This happens when thread a
acquires the lock (LockCount == 0) and thread b tries to
acquire it as well (LockCount == 1) but thread a hasn't had a
chance to set the OwningThread! So it's not an error when
OwningThread is NULL here! */
/* We don't own it, so we must wait for it */
RtlpWaitForCriticalSection(CriticalSection);
}
/* Lock successful */
/* Lock successful. Changing this information has not to be serialized because
only one thread at a time can actually change it (the one who acquired
the lock)! */
CriticalSection->OwningThread = Thread;
CriticalSection->RecursionCount = 1;
return STATUS_SUCCESS;