From 51220b9ed1c8cee561b872e2488b55f5c6f1ecbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer@reactos.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:03:08 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [NTOSKRNL] Remove the broken ASSERT once again. Sigh...

svn path=/trunk/; revision=55947
---
 reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c b/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c
index efc520294ce..96e4d1d0a12 100644
--- a/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c
+++ b/reactos/ntoskrnl/mm/ARM3/pagfault.c
@@ -919,9 +919,6 @@ UserFault:
         /* Right now, we only handle scenarios where the PDE is totally empty */
         ASSERT(PointerPde->u.Long == 0);
 
-        /* Right now, we expect a valid protection mask on the VAD */
-        ASSERT(ProtectionCode != MM_NOACCESS);
-
         /* And go dispatch the fault on the PDE. This should handle the demand-zero */
 #if MI_TRACE_PFNS
         UserPdeFault = TRUE;