From 1e41f9ec8580944bfe19ef84f57608c53b8ddef5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giannis Adamopoulos Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:06:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [user32_apitest] - remove all previous SetActiveWindow tests as they were completely wrong. This is because changing the z-order of the owner windows is done by SetWindowPos as tested in the same test suite. However SetActiveWindow calls SetWindowPos without SWP_NOOWNERZORDER parameter which leads to changing the zorder of owner windows svn path=/trunk/; revision=54023 --- rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c | 202 ++------------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-) diff --git a/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c b/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c index af8a1e4b6b6..cfb7a38df31 100644 --- a/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c +++ b/rostests/apitests/user32/SetActiveWindow.c @@ -11,15 +11,13 @@ #include "helper.h" #include -HWND hWnd1, hWnd2, hWnd3, hWnd4; +HWND hWnd1, hWnd2; /* FIXME: test for HWND_TOP, etc...*/ static int get_iwnd(HWND hWnd) { if(hWnd == hWnd1) return 1; else if(hWnd == hWnd2) return 2; - else if(hWnd == hWnd3) return 3; - else if(hWnd == hWnd4) return 4; else return 0; } @@ -79,31 +77,13 @@ static void create_test_windows() 20, 20, 300, 300, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL); hWnd2 = CreateWindowW(L"ownertest", L"ownertest", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW, - 20, 350, 300, 300, hWnd1, NULL, 0, NULL); - - hWnd3 = CreateWindowW(L"ownertest", L"ownertest", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW, 200, 200, 300, 300, NULL, NULL, 0, NULL); - - hWnd4 = CreateWindowW(L"ownertest", L"ownertest", WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW, - 250, 250, 200, 200, hWnd1, NULL, 0, NULL); } static void set_default_zorder() { - /* show the windows */ - ShowWindow(hWnd1, SW_SHOW); - UpdateWindow(hWnd1); - ShowWindow(hWnd2, SW_SHOW); - UpdateWindow(hWnd2); - ShowWindow(hWnd3, SW_SHOW); - UpdateWindow(hWnd3); - ShowWindow(hWnd4, SW_SHOW); - UpdateWindow(hWnd4); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd3, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - SetWindowPos(hWnd4, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); + SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); + SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); FlushMessages(); empty_message_cache(); @@ -113,198 +93,50 @@ static void destroy_test_window() { DestroyWindow(hWnd1); DestroyWindow(hWnd2); - DestroyWindow(hWnd3); - DestroyWindow(hWnd4); UnregisterClassW(L"testClass", 0); } -#define EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd1, hWnd2) \ - ok(get_iwnd(GetWindow(hWnd1,GW_HWNDNEXT)) == get_iwnd(hWnd2), \ - "After hwnd%d, expected hwnd%d not hwnd%d\n", \ - get_iwnd(hWnd1), get_iwnd(hWnd2),get_iwnd(GetWindow(hWnd1,GW_HWNDNEXT)) ) - -#define EXPECT_CHAIN(A,B,C,D,X) \ - EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##A, hWnd##B); \ - EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##B, hWnd##C); \ - EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##C, hWnd##D); \ - EXPECT_NEXT(hWnd##D, 0); \ - EXPECT_ACTIVE(hWnd##X); - -/* the actual test begins here */ - -MSG_ENTRY Activate1_chain[]= - {{4,WM_NCACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT,0,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT,4,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT,2,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE}, - {1,WM_NCACTIVATE}, - {1,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_KILLFOCUS}, - {1,WM_SETFOCUS}, - {0,0}}; - -MSG_ENTRY Activate2_chain[]= - {{1,WM_NCACTIVATE}, - {1,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {3,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING,SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE}, - {3,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED ,SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE}, - {3,WM_NCACTIVATE}, - {3,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {1,WM_KILLFOCUS}, - {3,WM_SETFOCUS}, - {0,0}}; - -MSG_ENTRY Activate3_chain[]= - {{3,WM_NCACTIVATE}, - {3,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE }, - {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,4, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE |SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE }, - {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE |SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE}, - {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,4, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE |SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE}, +MSG_ENTRY activate2to1_chain[]={ {2,WM_NCACTIVATE}, {2,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {3,WM_KILLFOCUS}, - {2,WM_SETFOCUS}, - {0,0}}; - -MSG_ENTRY Activate4_chain[]= - {{2,WM_NCACTIVATE, }, - {2,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT ,0 ,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE} , - {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 4, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE}, + {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,0, SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE}, + {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,0, SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE}, {1,WM_NCACTIVATE}, {1,WM_ACTIVATE}, {2,WM_KILLFOCUS}, {1,WM_SETFOCUS}, {0,0}}; -MSG_ENTRY Activate5_chain[]= - {{1,WM_NCACTIVATE, }, +MSG_ENTRY activate1to2_chain[]={ + {1,WM_NCACTIVATE}, {1,WM_ACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 0 ,SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE}, - {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {1,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT, 2, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT, 0, SWP_NOMOVE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE}, - {4,WM_NCACTIVATE}, - {4,WM_ACTIVATE}, + {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, SENT,0, SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE}, + {2,WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED, SENT,0, SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTMOVE|SWP_NOCLIENTSIZE}, + {2,WM_NCACTIVATE}, + {2,WM_ACTIVATE}, {1,WM_KILLFOCUS}, - {4,WM_SETFOCUS}, + {2,WM_SETFOCUS}, {0,0}}; -/* - some notes about this testcase: - from the expected series of messages it is obbvious that SetActiveWindow uses SetWindowPos. - So the big question is, that if this behaviour (of changing the z order of owner and owned windows) - is implemented in SetActiveWindow or SetWindowPos. - More tests reveal that calling SetWindowPos like this, has the same effect in the zorder: - SetWindowPos(hWndX, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); - However if it is called like this it does NOT change the z-order of owner or owned windows: - SetWindowPos(hWndX, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - So the conclusion is that SetActiveWindow calls Begin/Defer/EndDeferWindow pos - moving all affected windows in a batch move operation -*/ - -void Test_OwnerWindows() +void Test_msg_simple() { SetCursorPos(0,0); create_test_windows(); set_default_zorder(); - /* before we start testing SetActiveWindow we have to be sure they are on the ocrrect order*/ - EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,4); - - /* move the windows on top in the following order 1 2 3 1 4 */ SetActiveWindow(hWnd1); FlushMessages(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,1); - COMPARE_CACHE(Activate1_chain); - - SetActiveWindow(hWnd3); - FlushMessages(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(3,4,2,1,3); - COMPARE_CACHE(Activate2_chain); + COMPARE_CACHE(activate2to1_chain); SetActiveWindow(hWnd2); FlushMessages(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,2); - COMPARE_CACHE(Activate3_chain); - - SetActiveWindow(hWnd1); - FlushMessages(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,1); - COMPARE_CACHE(Activate4_chain); - - SetActiveWindow(hWnd4); - FlushMessages(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,4); - /* in this test xp and 7 give different results :/ */ - /*COMPARE_CACHE(Activate5_chain);*/ - - /* move the windows on top with the same order but now using SetWindowPos */ - /* note: the zorder of windows change in the same way they change with SetActiveWindow */ - set_default_zorder(); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,1); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd3, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(3,4,2,1,3); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,2); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(2,4,1,3,1); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd4, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(4,2,1,3,4); - - /* now do the same thing one more time with SWP_NOACTIVATE */ - set_default_zorder(); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(1,4,2,3,4); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd3, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(3,1,4,2,4); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd2, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(2,3,1,4,4); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd1, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - FlushMessages(); - empty_message_cache(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(1,2,3,4,4); - - SetWindowPos(hWnd4, 0, 0,0,0,0, SWP_NOSENDCHANGING|SWP_NOMOVE|SWP_NOREPOSITION|SWP_NOSIZE|SWP_SHOWWINDOW|SWP_NOACTIVATE); - FlushMessages(); - EXPECT_CHAIN(4,1,2,3,4); + COMPARE_CACHE(activate1to2_chain); destroy_test_window(); } START_TEST(SetActiveWindow) { - Test_OwnerWindows(); + Test_msg_simple(); }