From 10523b910e6a2f01abe70b3c4e2603386adaa87c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aleksandar Andrejevic <aandrejevic@reactos.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 19:11:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] [SOFT386] Don't single-step on a prefix. Single-step should
 execute one whole instruction.

svn path=/branches/ntvdm/; revision=60588
---
 lib/soft386/soft386.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/soft386/soft386.c b/lib/soft386/soft386.c
index a362cf93126..396cb6ec470 100644
--- a/lib/soft386/soft386.c
+++ b/lib/soft386/soft386.c
@@ -77,13 +77,19 @@ Soft386ExecutionControl(PSOFT386_STATE State, INT Command)
             /* A non-prefix opcode has been executed, reset the prefix flags */
             State->PrefixFlags = 0;
         }
+        else
+        {
+            /* This is a prefix, go to the next instruction immediately */
+            continue;
+        }
 
         /* Increment the time stamp counter */
         State->TimeStampCounter++;
     }
     while ((Command == SOFT386_CONTINUE)
            || (Command == SOFT386_STEP_OVER && ProcedureCallCount > 0)
-           || (Command == SOFT386_STEP_OUT && ProcedureCallCount >= 0));
+           || (Command == SOFT386_STEP_OUT && ProcedureCallCount >= 0)
+           || (Soft386OpcodeHandlers[Opcode] == Soft386OpcodePrefix));
 }
 
 /* PUBLIC FUNCTIONS ***********************************************************/